Naim Qassem, deputy secretary-general of Hezbollah,
told UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura last week that "painful
concessions" will be required for a political solution in Syria.
De Mistura is visiting Lebanon, Russia, Turkey,
Iran and other regional countries during what he described as a “very crucial period” for the Syrian political process.
The meeting with Qassem was the first by de Mistura
in his capacity as UN envoy for Syria. Di Mistura’s predecessor, Lakhdar Brahmi,
did not meet with Hezbollah officials in his capacity as UN/Arab League
envoy.
According to Al-Monitor columnist Jean Aziz, “painful concessions refer to the [Syrian] regime’s
acknowledgment of the opposition as a partner in governing and acknowledgement
by the opposition and those supporting it that the current regime is their
partner in Syria.”
Erdogan sets back Iran-Turkey ties
Erdogan sets back Iran-Turkey ties
In an Oct. 13 speech, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan lashed
out at Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, asking, “What kind of
religious leader [Khamenei] is this [who] says ‘[Syrian President Bashar al-]
Assad is the only one challenging Israel’? Assad didn’t shoot a bullet at
Israel. Assad killed 250,000, and you’re still supporting him, sending him money
and arms.”
Ali Hashem writes that Erdogan’s remarks were a setback for what was considered to be a mild warming trend following the Turkish president’s visit to Tehran in January.
Ali Hashem writes that Erdogan’s remarks were a setback for what was considered to be a mild warming trend following the Turkish president’s visit to Tehran in January.
An Iranian official told Hashem, “The death of
250,000 in Syria was caused by nations that back the terrorists in Syria. Turkey
is one of those states, and it has full responsibility for the situation today.
Mr. Erdogan personally knows that Iran is innocent. Iran is helping a legitimate
government restore control over its land and fight terrorists coming from around
the globe to kill and terrorize civilians. ... This [speech] is another
indication that Ankara isn’t really serious about cooperating to end the crisis
in Syria. It’s such a shame that an essential country in the region is still not
determined to fight terrorism, is hesitant to help its Kurdish neighbors in any way and at the
same time is attacking those who warned of this end from the beginning.”
Despite Erdogan’s comments, and Iran’s off-the-record
frustration with Turkey’s role in Syria, as reported by Hashem, Iranian Deputy
Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian took the diplomatic high road, saying
on Oct. 24, “Iran welcomes any bilateral and regional cooperation with Turkey,
Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other Muslim countries in the region in a genuine and
effective battle against terrorism and extremism.”
Erdogan points out US "mistake"
Criticizing the supreme leader of Iran may be one
thing, but Erdogan also could not resist taking a swipe at the United
States.
Erdogan’s remark on Oct. 22 that “the mistake can now be
seen,” after a stray pallet from a US airdrop to Syrian Kurdish forces fell into
IS hands, was taken as yet another sign, as if yet another sign as needed, that
the United States and Turkey differ on the urgency of defeating the Islamic
State (IS).
Semih Idiz reports that Erdogan’s decision to allow Iraqi
Kurdish peshmerga forces passage to Syria has “caused controversy in Turkey. The
military in particular is said to be unhappy about a corridor being opened for
the peshmerga, especially after the recent agreement reached in Erbil, the
capital of Iraqi Kurdistan, between various Kurdish groups to join forces
against IS.
Sources close to the military told Al-Monitor that the Turkish armed
forces continue to have a severe allergy to any military cooperation with Kurds,
fearing that the PYD [Syrian Kurdish Democratic Union Party] and the PKK
[Kurdistan Workers Party] will ultimately benefit from it. The idea of an
autonomous Kurdish entity along Turkey’s long border with Syria continues to
also be anathema to the Turkish military.”
Both the United States and Turkey consider the PKK a
terrorist organization.
Amberin Zaman writes that Erdogan’s approach to the US and
international appeals to support Syrian Kurdish forces in the battle against IS
over Kobani has been unnecessarily costly for Turkey:
“Turkey could have led the effort to support anti-IS
forces in Kobani by letting arms and fighters through its borders weeks ago.
This would have bolstered the peace process between Turkey and its own Kurds,
while averting the public relations disaster caused by images of Turkish tanks
and soldiers looking on as the Syrian Kurds battled IS in Kobani, thereby
reinforcing claims that 'Turkey supports IS.'”
Zaman explains how the PYD outmaneuvered Erdogan and boxed in Iraqi Kurdistan Region President Massoud Barzani (who also emerges as a possible winner, at least for now, for sending some peshemerga forces) to gain US and Western support for the PYD and its armed branch, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), in the battle for Kobani:
Zaman explains how the PYD outmaneuvered Erdogan and boxed in Iraqi Kurdistan Region President Massoud Barzani (who also emerges as a possible winner, at least for now, for sending some peshemerga forces) to gain US and Western support for the PYD and its armed branch, the People’s Protection Units (YPG), in the battle for Kobani:
“The Kurds adeptly used the media and global public
opinion — which depicted them as the region’s secular, pro-Western force, a
space formerly occupied by Turkey — to draw the US into the battle for Kobani.
The battle for Kobani then became a symbol of the contest between IS and the
coalition, one that the US could no longer afford to lose.
Moreover, the
concentration of IS forces around Kobani allowed the US to inflict heavy losses
on IS fighters. … Iraqi Kurdish President Massoud Barzani is probably unhappy
about US engagement with the PYD/PKK, which he views as rivals. But, unlike
Turkey, he has turned the situation to his own advantage by projecting himself
as a benevolent leader who has aided fellow Kurds in their time of need.”
Jerusalem’s silent intifada
Ben Caspit writes that a silent intifada is brewing in
Jerusalem. The potential for violence was on display when a Palestinian man from
East Jerusalem drove his car into a crowd, killing a 3-month-old child Oct. 22;
Israeli police shot the driver. Both Israelis and Palestinians demonstrated in
response.
Caspit reports that Israel is seeking to quickly
suppress this possible new intifada. He describes the "powder keg" that is
Jerusalem, especially because any provocation can go soon be subsumed into the
politics of the Temple Mount:
“Radicals from all sides are drawn to Jerusalem like
a moth to a flame. On one side of the barricade are radical Jewish movements
sanctifying the ascent of Jews for prayers on Temple Mount. On the other side of
the barricade are radical Islamists who view the Temple Mount as the Muslim
world’s “Holy of Holies” and they would not stand to see Jews in that area.
Neither side is really in the right. Everyone sees the issue through their own
subjective prism. Each side is yearning for a mega explosion and a massive
fireball that they believe will hasten the 'Day of Judgment.' The Muslims
believe that on that day God and his prophet Muhammad will scatter the Jews all
over and put an end to the Zionist enterprise. Jews, on the other hand, believe
that the Messiah will finally arrive and Muslims will be thrown into history’s
dumpster. It’s a pity that only the radicals in these volatile places get to
speak up, while the silent majority on both sides looks at them helplessly.
...
"Calls have been made in Israel to quickly and harshly suppress
this new intifada, no holds barred. Although this demand is justified, its
execution, however, is perilous. The situation is a powder keg just waiting to
explode all around us at any moment. And when it does, we will all look
wistfully at the 'silent intifada.' For the gates of hell to open, all it takes
is one unexpected incident on the Temple Mount that will spiral out of control,
resulting in a few Palestinian fatalities.
Israel understands that perfectly.
Abbas, on the other hand, is slightly less apprehensive. In a pugnacious speech
he delivered Oct. 17, in which he used harsh and unprecedented terms (as far as
he is concerned) to describe Israel and its policy, he called on the
Palestinians to rally in the defense of the Temple Mount. Abbas, too, is treading a very fine line here, poking the tiger. The last
time this tiger was provoked and went wild, the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat
tried riding on its back. We all know how that ended. So does Abbas. No one
wants to go back to that ending. If things continue to unfold at the same rate
as they do now, this ending will backlash at us, on its own initiative.”
Source: Al Monitor
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento